Case Law Library

This case analyzes whether MassHealth is correct in determining that the appellant’s spouse’s purchase of an annuity was a disqualifying transfer of assets.

This case analyzes whether proceeds from a survivorship claim pursued by the estate of a deceased Medicaid recipient are subject to Medicaid estate recovery.

This case analyzes whether plaintiffs have standing to pursue FDCPA and slander of title claims based on affidavits that asserted Ohio had an interest in their homes despite surviving spouse/disabled child protections.

This decision analyzes whether the settlors’ mistaken belief that the trust would protect their home from Medicaid eligibility and recovery constitutes an “unanticipated circumstance” under the Pennsylvania Uniform Trust Code that would justify terminating the irrevocable trust.

This decision analyzes whether S.P.’s act of depositing her own Social Security income into the trust converted it into a countable available resource for Medicaid eligibility purposes.

This decision analyzes whether Minnesota’s estate recovery statute allows DHS to recover the full amount of capitation payments made to a Medicaid managed care organization or only the amount the MCO actually paid to providers on behalf of the recipient.

This decision analyzes whether the agency acted arbitrarily or capriciously in determining that only $75/day of the assisted living facility cost was attributable to medical expenses, thereby denying Medicaid eligibility.

This decision analyzes whether IRA proceeds that are directed to sub-trusts created within a revocable trust are considered part of the decedent’s estate for purposes of determining an omitted spouse’s share.

This decision analyzes whether legal fees incurred during a decedent’s lifetime can be elevated in priority for estate payment based on equitable principles, even when they conflict with statutory claim priority under Michigan’s Estates and Protected Individuals Code.

This case analyzes whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment by resolving credibility disputes between competing affidavits regarding the authenticity of a signature on a promissory note.